Luke Photography » Art Photography

You can make easy money from home by licensing your Art & Photos online

Hanun — Mon, 26 Jul 2010 01:55:21 +0000

It is possible to earn multiple streams of income by selling or licensing your art, video and digital photos online without ever having to leave the house, speak to customers or pay any fees. This is really one of the most ideal opportunities for beginners to work from home as there are virtually no prequalification’s, experience or education required. Being a part-time freelance artist can be a really fun way to supplement your income and in the long run it could even earn you thousands of dollars every month.

Here’s how it works: First take some stellar photos or compose some masterpiece that you don’t mind sharing. Once you have a great photo or video or piece of art you’d like to sell then you create an account at a “microstock” agency like www.istockphoto.com. (You can find several sites like this one on Google.) Upload your work and you’re pretty much done.

The amount of money you can make this way depends largely on the quality of your work and the demand there is for it. Millions of people visit microstock websites every day and purchase the rights to use images, clip art and video that other people have submitted. Every time someone pays to access or download your work, you get paid.

But in all fairness you should know that when it comes to the microstock licensing model, the stock agency always gets a cut of your profits. The amount of your sales each agency keeps for themselves will vary from one agency to the next, but on average if your work is very popular and in high demand you could make anywhere from $5 to $50 each and every time someone downloads your work. And that’s just the amount of money ONE good photo could earn you. Imagine if you had 100 or 1000 photos licensed for sale online. Even if you only sold ONE copy of each all year that would be an additional income of $500 – $5,000.

Now I’d say that’s pretty good money, especially for something that you might otherwise have had just sitting around your house or stored on your hard drive collecting dust and doing nothing for you at all. Better yet it’s all passive income, meaning once you submit your work ONE TIME you really don’t have to do any additional work for it to continue earning you money month after month.

Granted, the reality of the situation is you might actually have to put some real effort into getting your stock photo income off the ground. Each agency keeps their own guidelines about what kind of quality standards and work they will accept and most digital photos that go for top dollar must be well composited and submitted at very high resolutions. It may take you a while to build up a good marketable stockpile of quality work, but that doesn’t necessarily mean you have to be a photography or art professional to submit your work.

If you’re serious about learning how to make money from home with your artwork I have created an incredibly helpful course that will teach you EXACTLY how to go about earning multiple streams of long term passive income with your art & photography at my website: www.showme-tellme.com. My course covers everything you need to know about submitting your work to microstock agencies in a clear easy to follow step-by-step format, including a list of dozens of agencies you can submit to. I will show you how to properly label your work with keywords so that you maximize the number of people who might be interested buying work. I will also show you several other opportunities for earning an income from your work including how to setup your own online photo storefront, how to turn your work into customizable merchandise like postcards and key chains, and even how to have your photos and artwork published as a marketable book.

The Studio Photography Industry – Why is it Broken

Hanun — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 01:36:25 +0000

Our industry is broken

I took some time to really look at the state of the professional photography industry today. I looked at it objectively as both a photographer and as a client to really try to figure out the next direction for the industry.

We know as photographers the industry is under a great deal of pressure form different sources and different reasons.

One of the most radical changes in the photographic industry is the emergence of high-quality affordable equipment. Anybody with a few grand can go pick up a high end Nikon or Canon and hang out a shingle. Yesterday they were working at the Waffle House today they are a photographer. In the past these new photographers were relegated to the sidelines because they could not produce the quality of image that the buying public required. They were snap shooters. Nothing more and nothing less.

Today those snap shooters are using the same gear the full-time professional photographer is and delivering the same basic quality.

Because the amateur-pro has none of the overhead requirements (insurance, licensing, advertising and other such business expenses) they can comfortably undercut the full-time pro from a pricing standpoint. Sometimes considerably. And their customer is happy because in their mind they saved a boatload of money.

This brings up the next issue that I see. We and a industry do not get the point that the pricing paradigm has changed. Because of the abundance of competent amateur-pros out there, full-time professional photographers, no matter of how much we scream about it are at a distinct cost disadvantage.

Let me give an example.

I do a lot of event photography. I go to the event take the pictures process them and post them for sale. My 5X7 print is 15.50 (which I have been told is way too inexpensive by my peers).

At an event recently there was a amateur-pro there who shot the same show and posted images for sale. You could tell the distinct difference in quality of capture, exposure and use of available lighting. His prints 5X7 prints were $5.00. He outsold me by more than $500 on that show.

Customers look for the big “V” word when deciding where to spend their money. VALUE is the name of the game. And value is perceived by the customer not defined by the photographer.

Even in a studio setting I have seen this value paradigm play out.

I was in a mall over the weekend. And we all have shown our professional contempt for the mall studios but have we really looked at them from a purely economic point of view?

The studio that I watched was a independent operation. Not one of the mall studios that we all know. Their packages that ranged from $12 to $36. The “portraits” were shot on green screen (that was clearly not lit properly). They offered “hundreds of backgrounds” and their output was done on an inkjet printer. Not fine art photography by any stretch of the imagination. They had the store full and there was a 2.5 hour wait for a sitting.

I was able to talk to a employee of this operation and she gave me some insights on their volume. On a weekend they will do 300 settings and about 150 through the rest of the week 450 settings a week is a astounding number. Each setting takes about 5 to 7 minutes. They have 2 camera positions to maintain that volume. They use a commercially available software package to do the chroma key.

Their target sale is 20.00 some more some less.

If we stop down and play with the numbers we can come up with a rough estimate on the profitability of this operation.

450X20 gives you $9000 gross a week and 36K a month.

What “conventional” studio would not love to have that amount of gross sales. And remember they are in a MALL location with all of the overhead attached to that.

The normal comeback for most studio owners is that these are low end customers that don’t spend money. Right answer they DON’T spend 300 bucks for a 8×10 but they DO spend money. The problem is that they want “pictures” and not “heirloom artistry that will be part of your family heritage for all time” They are a different customer that we as a industry have ignored. Moreover, we marginalize anyone that goes after that market because they are hurting OUR business. Nothing could be future from the truth.

We don’t want that customer. As professional photographers and ARTISTS that customer is beneath us. “We simply need to educate them on what quality is and they will come around” is a statement that I hear a lot … well that is poppycock they are never going to come around to our pricing mix. So we forget about that customer.

36K a month… I’d take that.

As a industry we also are guilty of positioning our product in a way that doesn’t attract customers that have a higher value threshold.

I looked at the senior portrait market as an example. Most studios advertise this just as they advertise their other services. Go to most web sites that focus on senior portraits and they are the same boring pretty piano music with the same “family heirloom” catch lines. It seems that the attitude is that we are going to overwhelm with our class to get 17 year olds that shop at Abercrombie and Fitch and would rather be online that in the real world to come in for beautiful senior portraits.

The most successful senior portrait studios have geared their marketing to that segment of the population. They get it. Many of us don’t and we wonder why we are not getting senior business. We are positioning our advertising to a traditional market that frankly hates pretty piano music.

We need to look at our customer and be much more responsive to their wants. Having a few acid treated images on your website does not make you a senior portrait studio. It is about attitude and for most of us the attitude that we project is “naptime”.

I think that for the photography industry to awaken, we have some major issues to address. We must change our pricing paradigm as it simply is not getting customers in the studio. Change our attitude. Most customers want great pictures not family heirlooms. They want to be excited and have a experience not bored to tears in studio

I think if we start there we will be well on our way to recovering a once great industry.

.

Where Art Mingle for Its Sake

Hanun — Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:13:12 +0000

The role that a gallery plays is significant in promoting art. A gallery is interpreted as a room or series of rooms where works of arts are exhibited. Artists of different vicinity and skills take help of these venues to display their work to the public and earn acclamations.

Gallery is the platform of various art forms: sculpture, fine arts, photography, handloom etc. And among them paintings are mostly common displayed norm. Galleries can be classified into public and private but they carry the same objective of promoting the work of art and zeal the artists. The former displays work of art of permanent collection i.e. of limited works. The latter refers to contemporary art gallery as they are privately owned and profit motive. These contemporary art galleries are open to the public without charge and are found clustered together in large urban centres.

Gallery carrying both national and international degree exhibit and preserve the work for coming generations. It is the perfect place for artist and art lovers to exchange new and fresh ideas. Additionally, it provides exposure and world wide recognition to an artist. Thus, it is a springboard for many debut artists.

For centuries the practice of displaying art has undergone major changes. People now seek help of online technology and chat live to promote their art. Online art fairs are slowly becoming an indispensable and preferred tool for both artist and art enthusiast. It enriches both species and makes them aware of the changing principles of art. Saatchi Gallery, founded by Charles Saatchi in London has adopted the online gallery tradition facilitating an open-access section for art lovers.

Galleries are designed in a spacious manner for displaying art and to envelop more visitors. At the events of any art showcase usually the theme of the exhibition are considered so that audience can grasp the subject matter of the exhibition.